News from the front
Precious Senator Alberto Bagnai,
My name is WhFsg Sdsjsk, I am 48 years old, I live somewhere and I have been working as a Financial Consultant since 1991, I am married and have a son.
I am an elector of the League and your personal admirer.
Allow me to disturb you by writing this letter to you regarding the Liquidity Decree, and in particular the possibility of accessing the subsidized loan of 25,000.00 euros. I confess to you that I was very saddened by the refusal for my request for funding.
At the end of April, I submitted the request to the bank, which very quickly resolved the operation without a hitch, but then at the time of disbursement, the request was blocked because the Ateco code of the Financial Advisors is not entered in the list of those who can benefit from this type of intervention.
Dear Senator, we Financial Advisors have a relevant social role, perhaps little publicized and known, we have followed our customers and their families, often for decades, with competence. unlimited time availability, dedication and self-sacrifice. We are close to them, we have planned their needs over the years, supported in the decisive choices of life, such as the purchase of real estate, succession planning, generational handover, marriage of children, serenity for old age.
And then the crises, such as the one we are experiencing now, not only on a health level; we called them, reassured them, we wrote them dozens of emails, we explained what was happening, we listened to them removing them from emotion and fear and persuaded them not to make irrational choices in difficult moments, such as the last two months.
We are in the trenches: in recent months we have recommended the purchase of Italian financial assets to support our economy: Italian Government Bonds, Shares and Investment Funds that invest on the Italian stock market, securitisations of SMEs to give liquidity to the Italian business system, tell me if we are not carrying out a delicate support work for our beloved country.
Just in these days, in these hours personally, I am calling all my clients for the placement of the BTP Italia Covid 19 which will start on Monday.
During this crisis the turnover has decreased and I am sure that it will decrease significantly in the coming months, not only because of the decrease caused by the turbulence and by the fall in the financial markets, but above all because of the divestments that we are carrying out and that we will carry out for our business customers. , who will put their personal assets to the survival of their entrepreneurial creatures.
The professional category of Financial Advisors once again not included with the latest amendments in the list of those entitled to guaranteed subsidized loans, only Insurance Agents, Brokers and Sub-agents have instead been included.
I understand that the issue is that the category is assimilated to pure banks and financial intermediaries to which state aid is inhibited by the EU.
But that's not the case at all ….
The Financial Advisors are micro-enterprises with VAT number, which have financial and insurance mandates, are registered in the Single Register of IVASS Insurance Intermediaries, and the category has had access to the bonus of € 600.00 as they are also equivalent to commercial agents.
I am sure that, knowing your attention to the economy of Italy and to the country that produces and invests, can make it clear to the Government that the obstacles that currently do not allow us to access the aforementioned subsidized financing provided for continuing to work are removed with serenity, to the benefit of the professional activity of support to the dozens of customers that I have been following daily for thirty years.
Thanks, a warm greeting and good work.
WhFsg Sdsjsk
"To eliminate kulaki as a class, the policy of limiting and eliminating individual groups of kulaki is not enough … it is necessary to break the resistance of this class with an open struggle and deprive it of the economic sources of its existence and its development . "
(Josif Stalin)
(… one example among many. Then there is the barbarism of those who indiscriminately take it with #aaaaabolidiga – I recommend: with five "a" progressively more strangled in an access of liveliness and uncontrollable and irrepressible social envy – and of those who cannot recognize a real caste when they meet it. We will try to do everything possible to make the little Stalin understand in a clutch bag, but their design is clear: to heal the country, which according to them also means and above all to hit small businesses " unproductive "and the" parasitic "professional classes, with the savings of the victims. Now, my question is: even if many have, because they earned them, the ten or twenty thousand euros needed to try to reopen – and often they need more – Why would they put them there? We mean it's their fault if they work honestly if they earned them? What is the sense? Suppose, once again, that the subsistence income is 10 and we take two people, of which one earns 10 and the other 12. Suppose that the crisis cuts 10% of the incomes of both. The one who earns 10 goes to 9, the one who earns 12 goes to 10.8. What do I do? Of course, what ends up below the subsistence threshold must help him, but … the other doesn't? And why!? It is not his fault if he has more! What is the purpose? Save everyone, or bring everyone to a subsistence income? It seems clear to me that the purpose of this government is the second: to bring everyone to a subsistence income, to complete euthanasia of the middle class by accompanying us towards a neo-feudal society, where the "third sector", the new secular ecclesia, will deal to help the destitute – making money – and the rescued (who will be less than they believe today) will cast themselves in compound guarded by armed guards. All beautiful, for heaven's sake, if it weren't inherently unstable … But they don't give a damn: they have no vision, they have no ability to develop scenarios. By sipping and hindering aid, they impose a masked asset on you that, at this point, perhaps it should be said, legitimate ex post who has built up liquidity buffers in any way he has done so. Because if those who govern attentive to the life of the governed, to the future of their families, it is difficult not to legitimize an extreme defense. The real evasion, meanwhile, continues undisturbed, between one and the other demagogic shoot on tax havens and bad Dutch people … that in reality none of those who govern really want to lead to different councils, for reasons that, from outside, we can only guess! So it is, if you like … )
This is a machine translation of a post (in Italian) written by Alberto Bagnai and published on Goofynomics at the URL https://goofynomics.blogspot.com/2020/05/notizie-dal-fronte.html on Sun, 24 May 2020 11:17:00 +0000. Some rights reserved under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 license.